Analysis of Low Back Pain Symptoms Felt by Intercity Bus Drivers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30994/jgrph.v10i2.588Keywords:
LBP, Intercity, Bus, Driver.Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a common lower back pain felt by bus drivers due to the static sitting position they use during work. This study aims to explore the causes of LBP symptoms felt by intercity bus drivers, focusing on travel distance and rest periods during work. The research method used was a qualitative case study. The informants were intercity bus drivers (Tulungagung-Surabaya) selected using purposive sampling. Data collection techniques included in-depth interviews, participant observation, documents, archival recordings, and physical device observations. The results of the study indicate that workers typically work 10–12 hours per day, traveling approximately 300 km round trip. Rest periods vary, from 2–6 hours per round trip, but are not always sufficient for physical recovery. Lower back pain is a common complaint due to prolonged sitting and fatigue, and is rarely treated medically. The dominant self-management strategies include rest, massage, drinking water, or herbal medicine. Management is advised to more structure driver driving and rest schedules in accordance with occupational safety standards. Regulators are also expected to monitor work hours and provide education on ergonomics and occupational health to minimize the risk of low back pain and maintain the safety and quality of transportation services.
Downloads
References
Bovenzi, M., & Zadini, A. (1992). Self-reported low back symptoms in urban bus drivers exposed to whole-body vibration. Spine, 17(9), 1048–1059.
Dennerlein JT, Cavallari JM, Kim JHJ, Green NH. The effects of a new seat suspension system on whole body vibration exposure and driver low back pain and disability: Results from a randomized controlled trial in truck drivers. Appl Ergon. 2022 Jan;98:103588. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103588. Epub 2021 Sep 22. PMID: 34562781; PMCID: PMC10861360.
European Transport Safety Council (ETSC). (2018). Managing fatigue: EU regulations and best practices for commercial drivers. Online : https://etsc.eu/wp-content/uploads/The-role-of-driver-fatigue-in-commercial-road-transport-crashes.pdf
Ghasemkhani, M., Mahmudi, E., & Jabbari, H. (2008). Musculoskeletal symptoms among bus drivers in Tehran. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 14(2), 167–173.
Islami, A. D. (2024). Relationship Between Sitting Duration and Complaints of Low Back Pain in Online Motorcycle Taxi Drivers in Bangkalan (Skripsi). Repository Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang / UMM. Online : https://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/16105
Jia, J., Zhang, M., Cao, Z. et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for low back pain among professional drivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 19, 551 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04999-z.
Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan tentang Jam Kerja dan Istirahat Pengemudi Kendaraan Umum. Online : https://share.google/moUpEQNhGutnupYFk
Lyons J. Factors contributing to low back pain among professional drivers: a review of current literature and possible ergonomic controls. Work. 2002;19(1):95-102. PMID: 12454355.
Mahmud, N., Schonstein, E., Schaafsma, F., & van der Molen, H. (2011). Evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of low back pain. Occupational Medicine, 61(4), 249–250.
Pickard O, Burton P, Yamada H, Schram B, Canetti EFD, Orr R. Musculoskeletal Disorders Associated with Occupational Driving: A Systematic Review Spanning 2006-2021. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 2;19(11):6837. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116837. PMID: 35682420; PMCID: PMC9180502.
Qaseem, A., Wilt, T. J., McLean, R. M., & Forciea, M. A. (2017). Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: A clinical practice guideline. Annals of Internal Medicine, 166(7), 514–530.
Williamson, A., Lombardi, D. A., Folkard, S., Stutts, J., Courtney, T. K., & Connor, J. L. (2011). The link between fatigue and safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(2), 498–515.
